Allow ductions from wages only under the conditions and to the extent provid for in national legislation or establish in collective labor agreements or arbitration awards. The exercise of these rights should be ensur by freely conclud collective labor agreements or by legally defin mechanisms for determining remuneration or by other means appropriate to national conditions so . Comment up dat LEX/el. art. ]. In turn in court jurisprudence fair remuneration is understood as follows A fair remuneration model that ensures the equivalence of earnings to the type and nature of work perform and the employee's experience and professional qualifications will take into account among others factors such as the remuneration scale applicable.
In the workplace; average level of remuneration for the same or similar nature of work perform in philippines photo editor a given industry; ucation; responsibilities; material responsibility and availability cf. Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of January ref. no. act III AUa / ]; Fairness of remuneration for work referr to in Art. of the Labor Code does not specify the upper limit on the amount of an employee's remuneration. Even granting an employee an unduly high benefit should not in principle be a reason for refusing to award it due to the security of trade the principle of pacta sunt servanda and employee protection. This means that the Company may take corrective actions in exceptional cases.
When the amount of remuneration agre between the parties is clearly and unquestionably unfair i.e. clearly inconsistent with the basis on which the employment relationship is bas cf. Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of May. The essence of fairness justice of remuneration is the equivalence of remuneration and work. This is not about equivalence consisting in full equivalent of remuneration and work.
發表於 13:12:45
